3. THE MORE RECENT STATE OF PLAY
Helen Cartwright In sadness
Russell's fantastic Principles of Mathematics #59; ch. 6 esp. #70 & #74; #127.
heraclitus.pdf ; quantities.pdf amounts and measures
Vere Chappell's Stuff and things here
Chappell on Aristotle on Matter
Strawson's Particular and General
Quine's Speaking of Objects
Hacker's Substance: The Constitution of Reality
George Boolos values of variables
Mass Terms - the collection Some Philosophical Problems
a KEY QUANTIFICATIONAL CONCEPT!!?? SOME WATER
'opening the can'
(But what happens to the worms?)
Rather than pursuing those familiar reductionist strategies which simply take for granted the adequacy of the predicate calculus or of a formal object ontology, I sponsor the desirability of taking at face value the intuitive contrast between stuff and things - even though some stuff is things.
Topics on General and Formal Ontology
the self in question
my own most recent work: OSO
initial attempt:Principia piece
"Words without Objects is an enjoyable polemic that grapples with some of the interesting and confusing issues of non-singularity, bringing semantic, ontic and logical considerations to bear on the puzzling phenomenon of non-singular nouns ... The book is a worthwhile read for anyone interested in some of the philosophical considerations regarding the many and the much ... it contains some very insightful and interesting arguments about a very difficult topic, and provides some delightful philosophical back-story."--Adam Sennet, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Laycock's recent monograph constitutes a welcome addition to the literature on the mass/count distinction, especially since it marks the first published book-length examination of these issues by a philosopher....Despite a voluminous literature on the mass/count distinction since the 1970s, primarily conducted from the perspective of model-theoretic semantics, I agree with Laycock's assessment that, in many ways, this area is still very much uncharted territory, particularly as its ontological significance is concerned.... I very much hope that Laycock's monograph will inspire, as it should, a resurgence of interest in what is after all, as George Boolos's seminal work on the semantics of plurals and second-order logic has shown, a prime breeding ground for questions concerning meaning, truth, reference, and quantification.... Laycock's view is certainly sufficiently provocative and intriguing in its unfamiliarity to warrant examination in the literature.... What is especially provocative and puzzling about Laycock's views.... is his position concerning the semantics of 'pure' non-count nouns, as well as the ontological and logical implications which, in his opinion, flow from this semantics....
What is novel about Laycock's approach is what he makes of these purported connections, in semantic, logical, and metaphysical terms. As the title of his book indicates, we are, in his view, dealing here with a category of 'words without objects'. Because such a category is unfamiliar to us and, if Laycock is right, cannot be accommodated in our familiar thinking about meaning, reference, truth, and logic, we have been at pains either to ignore its existence or to reduce it to the category of singular count-nouns with which we are more comfortable. Whoever engages in serious talk involving 'quantities', 'instances', 'aggregates', 'parcels of matter', and the like, in connection with such pure NCNs as 'air', 'water', 'ice', and 'mud', is, in Laycock's view, guilty of what he calls the 'strangely mesmeric tendency to privilege the singular' and of imposing an 'alien logic' on a class of expressions which deserves its own status.
Since, as far as I can see, Laycock's charge affects all of us who have ever written on the count/ non-count distinction, his sweeping indictment and, as well, the new direction he suggests, deserve to be taken seriously.... given its wide-ranging and shattering break with our familiar semantic, logical, and metaphysical tradition, I suspect that, for many of us, Laycock's study contains too few details to cure us once and for all of our deeply engrained tendency to 'singularize'.... In sum, if Laycock is right, then we have all suffered for a long time - in fact, to be precise, since the time of the Presocratics - from something like a collective delusion, viz., the 'singularizing tendency'; its accompanying object- and identity-involving semantics, logic, and metaphysics is tailored specifically to the needs of singular count-nouns. The possibility of an apparent mass deception of this sort and its possible causes are of course worth investigating.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, March 2007
Kathrin Koslicki, Tufts University
In this approachable, philosophically -oriented book, Laycock offers a
‘descriptive metaphysics’ . . . of stuff or matter” and addresses “the formal behaviour, including that under the quantifiers, of a large and central set of non-count nouns. . . . sometimes called mass nouns” (p. ix).....I wholeheartedly recommend this useful, stimulating and worthwhile book to anyone who wants to think about the topics it addresses.
PHILOSOPHICAL BOOKS, JULY 2008, STEPHEN K MCLEOD, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL
It's a little stuffy in here
{a fairly new and seriously undeveloped blog spot)
MY TOTALLY DOWNLOADABLE RESEARCH PAGE HERE
Linguistic and Philosophical lInvestigations
Topics on General and Formal Ontology (Paolo Valore ed.)
to see a world in a ... bowl of miso soup
[click n wait]
journal/my.stuff link Analysis
4. OTHER OBSERVATIONS,CONNECTIONS AND GENERALISATIONS
Metaphysics is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct
F. H. Bradley, modified by myself
... but no less frequently, it is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct
find it quite impossible to ..
(but again, instinct is not always a guide to truth)
All fixed, fast frozen relations…are swept away
all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify
All that is solid melts into air
all that is sacred is profaned ...
Marx & Engels on modern bourgeois society
philosophy for all wikiphilosophy
4 ENCYCLOPEDIAS, some only for subscribing institutions
Stanford here
Britannica here
Internet hereColumbia here
phil. of language ryckman
MARX low marx capitalism & slavery
Rachel Carson's role: 'Three key events mark out modern environmentalism' s beginnings. The first was the publication in 1962 of Silent Spring, the devastating indictment of the effects of large-scale spraying of agricultural pesticide on American wildlife by Rachel Carson (the centenary of whose birth was celebrated last month). That woke people up to the fact that we were visibly harming the natural world on a large scale...' MORE....





















































