3. THE MORE RECENT STATE OF PLAY

Below are what I take to be a few of the key documents in the development of the theory of non-count nouns and/or stuff. Other documents of interest are on the right.

  
Helen Cartwright In sadness 

Russell's fantastic Principles of Mathematics  #59; ch. 6 esp. #70 & #74; #127.

heraclitus.pdf ;  quantities.pdf amounts and measures

Vere Chappell's Stuff and things here

Chappell on Aristotle on Matter 

Strawson's Particular and General

Quine's Speaking of Objects

Hacker's Substance: The Constitution of Reality

George Boolos      values of variables

Mass Terms - the collection Some Philosophical Problems 

PLURALS

a KEY QUANTIFICATIONAL CONCEPT!!??  SOME WATER 

THE PERSONAL PROJECT  

'opening the can' 

 (But what happens to the worms?) 

Rather than pursuing those familiar reductionist strategies which simply take for granted the adequacy of  the predicate calculus or of a formal object ontology, I sponsor the desirability of  taking at face value the intuitive contrast between stuff and things - even though some stuff is things.

Topics on General and Formal Ontology 

the self in question

 email me

my own most recent work: OSO 

initial attempt:Principia piece

"Words without Objects is an enjoyable polemic that grapples with some of the interesting and confusing issues of non-singularity, bringing semantic, ontic and logical considerations to bear on the puzzling phenomenon of non-singular nouns ... The book is a worthwhile read for anyone interested in some of the philosophical considerations regarding the many and the much ... it contains some very insightful and interesting arguments about a very difficult topic, and provides some delightful philosophical back-story."--Adam Sennet, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 

 

Laycock's recent monograph constitutes a welcome addition to the literature on the mass/count distinction, especially since it marks the first published book-length examination of these issues by a philosopher....Despite a voluminous literature on the mass/count distinction since the 1970s, primarily conducted from the perspective of model-theoretic semantics, I agree with Laycock's assessment that, in many ways, this area is still very much uncharted territory, particularly as its ontological significance is concerned.... I very much hope that Laycock's monograph will inspire, as it should, a resurgence of interest in what is after all, as George Boolos's seminal work on the semantics of plurals and second-order logic has shown, a prime breeding ground for questions concerning meaning, truth, reference, and quantification.... Laycock's view is certainly sufficiently provocative and intriguing in its unfamiliarity to warrant examination in the literature.... What is especially provocative and puzzling about Laycock's views.... is his position concerning the semantics of 'pure' non-count nouns, as well as the ontological and logical implications which, in his opinion, flow from this semantics....

What is novel about Laycock's approach is what he makes of these purported connections, in semantic, logical, and metaphysical terms. As the title of his book indicates, we are, in his view, dealing here with a category of 'words without objects'. Because such a category is unfamiliar to us and, if Laycock is right, cannot be accommodated in our familiar thinking about meaning, reference, truth, and logic, we have been at pains either to ignore its existence or to reduce it to the category of singular count-nouns with which we are more comfortable. Whoever engages in serious talk involving 'quantities', 'instances', 'aggregates', 'parcels of matter', and the like, in connection with such pure NCNs as 'air', 'water', 'ice', and 'mud', is, in Laycock's view, guilty of what he calls the 'strangely mesmeric tendency to privilege the singular' and of imposing an 'alien logic' on a class of expressions which deserves its own status.

Since, as far as I can see, Laycock's charge affects all of us who have ever written on the count/ non-count distinction, his sweeping indictment and, as well, the new direction he suggests, deserve to be taken seriously.... given its wide-ranging and shattering break with our familiar semantic, logical, and metaphysical tradition, I suspect that, for many of us, Laycock's study contains too few details to cure us once and for all of our deeply engrained tendency to 'singularize'.... In sum, if Laycock is right, then we have all suffered for a long time - in fact, to be precise, since the time of the Presocratics - from something like a collective delusion, viz., the 'singularizing tendency'; its accompanying object- and identity-involving semantics, logic, and metaphysics is tailored specifically to the needs of singular count-nouns. The possibility of an apparent mass deception of this sort and its possible causes are of course worth investigating.

 

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, March 2007

Kathrin Koslicki, Tufts University

 

In this approachable, philosophically -oriented book, Laycock offers a 

‘descriptive metaphysics’ . . . of stuff or matter” and addresses “the formal behaviour, including that under the quantifiers, of a large and central set of non-count nouns. . . . sometimes called mass nouns” (p. ix).....I wholeheartedly recommend this useful, stimulating and worthwhile book to anyone who wants to think about the topics it addresses.

PHILOSOPHICAL BOOKS, JULY 2008, STEPHEN K MCLEOD, UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL

It's a little stuffy in here

{a fairly new and seriously undeveloped blog spot)

MY TOTALLY DOWNLOADABLE RESEARCH PAGE HERE

                            
                      Linguistic and Philosophical lInvestigations

 Topics on General and Formal Ontology (Paolo Valore ed.)

 

 to see a world in a ... bowl of miso soup

[click n wait]

 journal/my.stuff link Analysis

 

 

 

4. OTHER OBSERVATIONS,CONNECTIONS AND GENERALISATIONS

                        frequently

Metaphysics is                    the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct

F. H. Bradley, modified by myself

... but no less frequently, it is the finding of bad reasons for what we                                    believe upon instinct

              find it quite impossible to  ..

(but again, instinct is not always a guide to truth)

. 

 

All fixed, fast frozen relations…are swept away

all new-formed ones become antiquated before they can ossify

All that is solid melts into air

all that is sacred is profaned ... 

Marx & Engels on modern bourgeois society


philosophy for all wikiphilosophy 

4 ENCYCLOPEDIAS, some only for subscribing institutions

Stanford  here 

Britannica here

Internet here

Columbia here

 

EN FRANCAIS 

 grammatical number

phil. of language ryckman

the reality of negative facts 

 MARX low marx  capitalism & slavery

the Romanian conection 

 
 

. 

Rachel Carson's role: 'Three key events mark out modern environmentalism' s beginnings. The first was the publication in 1962 of Silent Spring, the devastating indictment of the effects of large-scale spraying of agricultural pesticide on American wildlife by Rachel Carson (the centenary of whose birth was celebrated last month). That woke people up to the fact that we were visibly harming the natural world on a large scale...'    MORE....